Quantitative and Qualitative Research Study Article

Quantitative and Qualitative Research Study - Article Example identification of the problem, methods of carrying out the research, the findings, the barrier to the implementation process and finally the discussion. Quantitative study is more reliable as it as a development of the qualitative study. This method of research is basically a primarily examining research. This is because it’s applied to get awareness and an understanding opinions, and incentives. This research offers insights into the problem or assists to come up with different ideas as well as the applicable hypotheses for a possible quantitative research. Qualitative Research is besides applicable in uncovering process on the trends in beliefs and ideas, and usually digs deeper into the problem. The collection of Qualitative data is via methods that vary as they are not structured or are semi-structured methods. Some of the common methods comprise focus groups, interviews, and participation, and observations. In this method, the sample size is usually small, and the subjects that are selected are representatives of a particular quota (Glassman, 2004). Based on my experience as a nurse, the development of an effective evidence-based practice (EBP) is very essential. In order for a nurse to display credibility, they ought to display an effective incorporation of evidence, comprising of research findings, to their clinical decision-making process. For this to be implemented, nurses ought to develop a interrogative and critical outlook to practice by developing a question about nursing practice that may come from a various sources such as patients. A good question is developed via the help of the PICO analysis. The next step is to look for most relevant evidence on the question. Evidence is present in books and journals done by individuals with awareness in EBP and with professional expertise. These sources are present in the internet and specialist databases such as the university libraries. Locating the evidence is often time consuming (Cranston, 2002). It